Current Issues

2022 : Volume 1, Issue 1

A Practical Guide to An Altmetric Analysis and Top 100 most Mentioned Dentistry Articles

Author(s) : Ricardo Grillo 1 and Victor Hugo Nastri 2

1 Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery , Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic , Brazil

2 Department of Restorative Dentistry , Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic , Brazil

Int J Dent Oral Care

Article Type : Research Article

DOI : https://doi.org/10.53996/2831-8706.ijdoc.1000105

Abstract

Objectives: A massive number of articles are published every year concerning dentistry, and it is a superhuman task to read and get actualized about it. The aim of this study is to create a list of higher altmetric scores articles in dentistry and teach how to perform this kind of bibliometric analysis.
 
Material and Methods: Research on the term "dentistry" was done using the Dimensions app (retrospective study). Results were ranked in altmetric citations and analyzed through Microsoft Excel to create some tables and graphics to facilitate data visualization. Graphical illustration of keywords was created using VOSviewer. Some statistical tests were performed with a confidence interval at 95% (p<0.05).
 
Results: The United States is the country that leads this list of high interest in dentistry articles, and some fascinating subjects can be noted, like growing interest in dental office aggressions, preventive care, and phytotherapy, among others. A practical guide how to perform an altmetric analysis was discussed.
 
Conclusion: Altmetric analysis is a new web-based, valuable manner to scientific updates, a complementary analysis to bibliometric analysis. Altmetrics is a free, useful, quick and available to everyone way to update in dentistry.
 
Clinical Relevance: altmetrics is a new and efficient manner to be attualized.
 
Objectives statement: The reader should know this free type of bibliometric analysis and to know how to perform it.
 
Keywords: Social media; Altmetric; Citation; Impact Factor; Bibliometrics; Dentistry; Twitter

Introduction

Humankind has a solid basis for evolution through science. Researches and their publications are fundamental to science spread, and when scientists publish a magnificent article, this article could improve many concepts. A terrific science publication could lead to a series of other important scientific papers, resulting in the benefit of science and humanity.

Some tools were created to analyze these articles, and scientometrics is one of them. Scientometrics, metric values of scientific papers, can be divided into some other fields, like bibliometrics and altmetrics. Bibliometrics uses statistical methods to analyze books, articles, or any scientific paper through some tools like citation analysis, a more traditional way of assessing scientific impact. Altmetrics is an alternative form of scientometrics, using internet information to calculate the web impact of scientific papers and gaining space in science. A significant advantage of altmetric analysis is its availability, given that altmetrics is free.

This retrospective study provides a list of the most mentioned articles related to dentistry. The author hypothesizes that any kind of study or professional level could be aided with some form of bibliometric analysis, like altmetrics, and this could save time and effort in any level of study. The specific aim of this study was to produce this list of top 100 articles with highest altmetric score, with some statistical tests performed to confirm more exciting topics and to show steps to perform an altmetric search. This analysis could help dentists of all specialities to get informed concerning their own speciality.

Material and Methods

A bibliographic search was done through the Dimensions app on April 17, 2021, using the strategy “dentistry” in the "Title and Abstract" option from 1839 until 2021. Articles were ordered in altmetric citations (Altmetric LLP, London, UK), and data were tabled and analyzed through Microsoft Office Excel 2010 (Microsoft, Richmond, USA) using statistical tests and charts. Articles with no relation to dentistry were excluded manually as duplicates (systematic review updates).

Data were analyzed to output the most relevant and up-to-date scientific papers about dentistry according to the Altmetric Attention Score (AAS). AAS extracts data from some web-based sources like Twitter, Facebook, or Mendeley readers. For each different indicator, AAS uses a different weight [Table 1 and Figure 1].

Data resources

Weight

News

8

Blog

5

Policy document (per source)

3

Patent

Wikipedia

Peer review (Publons, Pubpeer)

1

Weibo

Google +

F1000

Open Syllabus

Linkedin

0,5

Twitter

0,25

Facebook

Reddit

Pinterest

Q&A

Youtube

Table 1: Altmetric Attention Score Weight.

Source: https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000233311-how-is-the-altmetric-attention-score-calculated


Figure 1: Example of Altmetric score in Dimensions.

The top 100 articles are based on the Altmetric score. For each article included, we extracted: Altmetric Attention Scores, number of scientific citations (bibliometrics), journal title, country of origin, institution, subject categories. Country of origin and affiliate institution was linked to the corresponding author. In case of the absence of this information, data were used from the last author. If any data are not available, it was considered as Not Found (NF). Articles with no relation to dentistry and published by any non-health professionals were excluded. Any discordance of data was solved by the authors' consensus. Some tables and graphs were created in order to facilitate data visualization through Microsoft Office Excel and VOS viewer (Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands).

Results

We have found 112,778 articles about dentistry and, depending on the bibliographic platform, and this number can reach more results. A PubMed search, on the same date, has achieved 625,291 articles. The list of the top 100 dentistry articles with the highest AAS is provided in Table 2.

Dimensions Citations

Citation Density

AAS

AAS Density

Reference

Year

2

0,67

1249

416,33

Charlier et al. [1]

2018

62

20,67

858

286,00

Moore et al. [2]

2018

155

31,00

595

119,00

Coté, Wilson [3]

2016

6

2,00

563

187,67

Muirhead et al. [4]

2018

8

2,67

563

187,67

Nagrath et al. [5]

2018

10

2,00

522

104,40

Ojaghi et al. [6]

2016

64

12,80

519

103,80

Wright et al. [7]

2016

95

11,88

496

62,00

Moore, Hersch [8]

2013

27

5,40

443

88,60

Aminoshariae et al. [9]

2016

600

600,00

425

425,00

Meng et al. [10]

2020

10

2,50

426

106,50

Spera et al. [11]

2017

1

0,25

391

97,75

Crowley [12]

2017

285

47,50

319

53,17

Dawood et al. [13]

2015

84

12,00

299

42,71

Sheiham, James [14]

2014

44

4,89

283

31,44

Bernardini et al. [15]

2012

49

9,80

247

49,40

Beukers et al. [16]

2017

6

1,20

244

48,80

Al-Jewair et al. [17]

2016

12

4,00

239

79,67

Taylor et al. [18]

2018

31

6,20

232

46,40

Peralta et al. [19]

2016

9

9,00

216

216,00

Shah et al. [20]

2020

38

19,00

185

92,50

Lockhart et al. [21]

2019

2147

357,83

185

30,83

Habib et al. [22]

2015

423

70,50

185

30,83

Levy et al. [23]

2015

8

8,00

182

182,00

Plog et al. [24]

2020

6

6,00

177

177,00

Nalliah et al. [25]

2020

33

3,30

171

17,10

Singh, Purohit [26]

2011

137

68,50

167

83,50

Watt et al. [27]

2019

26

3,71

161

23,00

Frese et al. [28]

2014

93

11,63

152

19,00

Giannobile et al. [29]

2013

61

4,07

148

9,87

Coppa et al. [30]

2006

0

0,00

147

147,00

Rhoades et al. [31]

2020

24

8,00

146

48,67

Ramsay et al. [32]

2018

2

0,40

140

28,00

Minozzi et al. [33]

2016

59

9,83

132

22,00

Yue et al. [34]

2015

23

23,00

127

127,00

Vergara-Buenaventura, Castro-Ruiz [35]

2020

1

0,50

127

63,50

Moore et al. [36]

2019

0

0,00

125

125,00

Istrate et al. [37]

2021

20

2,22

123

13,67

Grandjean [38]

2012

33

6,60

124

24,80

Brewer et al. [39]

2016

15

1,36

123

11,18

Bush et al. [40]

2010

0

0,00

116

58,00

Spivak [41]

2019

199

199,00

114

114,00

Sabino-Silva et al. [42]

2020

101

12,63

115

14,38

Sood, Nagpal [43]

2013

236

47,20

113

22,60

Cohen et al. [44]

2016

23

3,83

113

18,83

Cubayachi et al. [45]

2015

0

0,00

107

107,00

Hatfield at el [46]

2020

93

11,63

105

13,13

ten Cate [47]

2013

299

21,36

105

7,50

Watt [48]

2007

32

16,00

103

51,50

Innes et al. [49]

2019

95

15,83

103

17,17

Padovani et al. [50]

2015

15

15,00

101

101,00

Passarelli et al. [51]

2020

96

19,20

101

20,20

Wright et al. [52]

2016

146

13,27

94

8,55

Thomson et al. [53]

2010

24

4,00

94

15,67

Prajapati et al. [54]

2015

1

1,00

92

92,00

Rhoades et al. [55]

2020

26

5,20

91

18,20

Simon [56]

2016

2

1,00

85

42,50

Souto-Maior et al. [57]

2019

9

4,50

84

42,00

Thornhill et al. [58]

2019

69

23,00

84

28,00

Slayton et al. [59]

2018

57

7,13

83

10,38

Glenny et al. [60]

2013

48

9,60

83

16,60

Manfredi et al. [61]

2016

26

3,25

82

10,25

Turner et al. [62]

2013

6

6,00

81

81,00

Watt [63]

2020

5

2,50

79

39,50

Coll et al. [64]

2020

67

5,58

79

6,58

Chaturvedi [65]

2009

14

2,00

77

11,00

Mann et al. [66]

2014

5

1,00

77

15,40

Sandeep et al. [67]

2016

331

19,47

76

4,47

Harrel, Molinari [68]

2004

59

8,43

74

10,57

Carter et al. [69]

2014

24

6,00

73

18,25

Niederman et al. [70]

2017

68

9,71

73

10,43

Genco et al. [71]

2014

124

124,00

72

72,00

Coulthard [72]

2020

25

4,17

72

12,00

Tian et al. [73]

2015

12

4,00

71

23,67

Schwendicke et al. [74]

2019

0

0,00

70

70,00

Holden et al. [75]

2021

27

3,86

70

10,00

Williams et al. [76]

2014

9

2,25

70

17,50

Couto et al. [77]

2017

44

11,00

70

17,50

Pynnonen et al. [78]

2017

9

2,25

69

17,25

Stockton et al. [79]

2017

53

8,83

67

11,17

Mejàre et al. [80]

2015

23

2,88

66

8,25

Bissar et al. [81]

2013

5

2,50

65

32,50

Abadeh et al. [82]

2019

42

4,67

65

7,22

Sbaraini et al. [83]

2012

15

3,00

64

12,80

Ashley et al. [84]

2016

238

13,22

63

3,50

Hale [85]

2003

6

1,50

61

15,25

Saxen et al. [86]

2017

8

2,67

60

20,00

Holden  [87]

2018

1

1,00

61

61,00

Brondani, Donnelly [88]

2020

51

5,67

60

6,67

Rathore et al. [89]

2012

131

16,38

59

7,38

Emami et al. [90]

2013

58

3,05

59

3,11

Burt [91]

2002

16

4,00

57

14,25

Afrastehfar, Assery [92]

2017

31

5,17

57

9,50

Bidra et al. [93]

2016

20

10,00

56

28,00

Thompson et al. [94]

2019

4

0,57

56

8,00

Stevens [95]

2014

5

2,50

55

27,50

McGrath [96]

2019

63

2,86

56

2,55

Klein, Nowak [97]

1999

16

5,33

56

18,67

Ashley et al. [98]

2018

15

15,00

55

55,00

Nagraj et al. [99]

2020

8

2,67

54

18,00

Ensaldo-Carrasco et al. [100]

2018

Table 2: List of the 100 articles order through AAS.

Mean AAS was [56,65], ranging from [54]100 to 1250 [1]. A total of 63 different journals are part of this list; Journal of the American Dental Association has the higher number of articles in this list, 14 followed by British Dental Journal and Journal of Dental Research with six. Mean number of citations is 21,50, ranging from 0 [37,41,46,55,87] to 2147 [22] citations.

There are 75 different worldwide institutions from 19 countries and four continents. University College of London leads the list with six published articles, followed by New York University, State University of New York, University of Michigan and University of Sydney with three articles. United States of America leads the list of countries of origin with a much larger quantity of articles than average amount, 40 articles followed by United Kingdom with 17 and Australia with 6 published articles [Figure 2].


Figure 2: Countries of origin of top 100 articles with highest AAS.

Richard Geddie Watt, Head of Department of Epidemiology and Public Health of University College London is the author with the most significant number of articles on this list. Two articles about oral health care [27,48] and one about opportunity for a reform in dentistry in this COVID-19 pandemic [63]. Two of these articles were published in a very high impact factor journal [27,63].

Articles, topics were divided into basic sciences/dental materials, cariology/oral health, endodontics, forensic dentistry, implantology, oral and maxillofacial surgery, pathology, patients with special needs, pediatrics, periodontology, perspectives and new technologies, pharmacology, restorative/prosthetic dentistry, and veterinary dentistry. More common keyword related to “dentistry” are “humans”, “female”, “male”, “adult” and “child”. An interesting fact about keyword on dentistry search is, next more cited keyword, on sixth place, is “covid-19”. A graphical representation of keywords [Figure 3] and authors [Figure 4] was performed through VOS viewer software.

Figure 3: A graphical visualization of keywords performed through VOS viewer software.

Figure 4: A graphical overlay visualization of authors performed through VOS viewer software. Only recent publications were included due to huge number of publications, from older (blue) to new ones (yellow).

Statistical Analysis of top 100 list

According to the Shapiro–Wilk test, the distribution of data regarding number of citations, AAS, citation density, article age was not normal (p<0.05). Pearson’s correlation tests revealed that there was a poor positive correlation between number of citations and AAS (r=0.0403, p<0.05).

Discussion

There are some relevant aspects in this study. Preventive treatments [7,49,59,64,66,70,85,95] and perspectives and handling on COVID-19 [10,20,24,35,42,51,63,72,88] are two everyday matters. Internet users are more interested in prevention than in restorative techniques. Dentists and patients are concerned about how COVID-19 affects dental offices in several manners, since reducing contamination through aerosol [24,99], decreased risk of infection in the dental office [35,42,51] and even how COVID affects antibiotic uses in dental practice 20. An article with high AAS (101) from 2020 51 calms down scared people about getting infected in dental offices since it relates some procedures usual in dental offices, even before the COVID-19 pandemic, are very effective in infection control.

Pediatrics is a subject that also attracts the attention of many people. Given the difficulty some professionals face when attending children, anesthesia in pediatrics is a fascinating matter [11,36,67,98]. Of course, preventive treatments, especially in children, are usually [7,74,81,85,95] and this interest must continue through years. Preventive treatments interests in children and adults too [6,47,49,59,64,70], including relation between sugar intake and caries [14].New technologies about needle-free anesthesia [45,77] and 3D printing [5,13] are on this list. Pharmacology is a high interest subject, particularly antibiotic [21,22,41,60], anesthesics [45,77,79,84,86] and pain control [23,25,46,58]. Phytotherapy in dentistry is also interesting to people, notably turmeric [65] and its active chemical substance, curcumin 43. Three articles about an unusual theme are part of this list, paleodontology [15,30,33].

A matter of concern is the number of aggressions through dentists and dental students and two articles [31,55] about handling this situation, from New York University has a high AAS. Authors are very incisive about the need to discuss this problem in dental practices and, due to the lack of articles, this is a subject that could interest readers and editors.

Nowadays, we have a world of information at our disposal, and it is increasingly difficult to transform this dull amount of data into knowledge. Due to the high impact of the internet on our lives, health professionals cannot let data from online social media out of discussion [101]. The use of a tool that could guide the scientific community on the most searched and commented data is of great value, and this is the importance of altmetric analysis. Scientific information of relevance is found with greater availability and, because of so much availability, AAS can be a precious guide to filter matters of greater pertinence [102]. A search on Goggle Trends can show us an increase interest about term “altmetrics” [Figure 5].



Figure 5: An increasing interest about “altmetrics” on Google Trends over the last 15 years. A world map with higher interested countries (darker blue shows a higher interest).


Altmetrics and bibliometrics analysis are not the same, but they correlate; some studies relate a strong correlation, some, weak [101]. In this present study, correlation is very poor [Figure 6], a factor that attests that both analyzes are independent and can be used together, one complementing another [103,105]. AAS is a handy tool as a guide to our professional studies and helps health professionals know what patients are looking for. Altmetrics could solve one ancient and persistent dentistry problem, slow recognition of new dental or medical technologies by students and graduates [106]. Dental professionals, researchers, and journal editors ought to pay attention to altmetrics [106] and bibliometrics.

If we compare several articles in a determined year in an AAS to a citation rank (bibliometric analysis), the difference between groups is visually apparent. While in an altmetric ranking, citations are harnessed and condensed to recent years, in a bibliometric ranking, the numbers of citations are scattered through years, and few or no citations are recent. This can be explained due to the time of publishing an article, and this article is cited in another paper takes longer than to be cited in any social media (Twitter, Facebook) or another digital media like Wikipedia [103]. No article in this list is part of bibliometric analysis performed in “The most cited articles in dentistry” [104] published in 2014, which generates a strong basis about the poor correlation between these two forms of scientometrics; one is complementary to the other.




Figure 6: Graphical representation of Pearson correlation between citations and AAS. A positive but very low correlation.

To perform an altmetric analysis is quick when Dimensions app or site is used. Subject can be found typing it, like any other bibliographic search, with field “Title and abstract” selected [Figure 7]. Then, articles can be sorted by some manners like relevance, year of publication, number of citations, and Altmetric attention score. Right below main reference, number of citations, and AAS are shown. Some services like adding to library are paid.



Figure 7: Dimensions search term “dentistry” sorted by altmetric attention score.

Conclusion

Altmetrics is available to everyone way to update, not only in dentistry but to all specialities, themes and topics. An altmetric analysis is helpful in seeing actual tendencies and interests about scientific articles that have been read and commented just now, not only cited by another paper but also by all web-based media, including social media, and an excellent manner to be actualized. As the final ranking is constantly in changes, an update is necessary, authors believe in about two or three years.

Acknowledgment

Funding: This article was not supported by any grant.

Competing Interests

Authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical approval: Not required.

Patient Consentment: Not required.

Consent for publication: Not applicable

Author’s contribution: All authors contributed equally to this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Charlier P, Weil R, Rainsard P, et al. The Remains of Adolf Hitler: A Biomedical Analysis and Definitive Identification. Eur J Intern Med. 2018;54:e10-e12.
  2. Moore PA, Ziegler KM, Lipman RD, et al. Benefits and Harms Associated With Analgesic Medications Used In The Management of Acute Dental Pain. J Am Dent Assoc. 2018;149:256-265.e3.
  3. Cote CJ, Wilson S. Guidelines for Monitoring and Management of Pediatric Patients Before, During, and After Sedation for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures: Update 2016. Pediatrics. 2016;138:e20161212-e20161212.
  4. Muirhead VE, Quayyum Z, Markey D, et al. Children’s Toothache Is Becoming Everybody’s Business: Where Do Parents Go When Their Children Have Oral Pain in London, England? A Cross-Sectional Analysis. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e020771.
  5. Nagrath M, Sikora A, Graca J, et al. Functionalized Prosthetic Interfaces using 3D printing: Generating Infection-Neutralizing Prosthesis In Dentistry. Mater Today Commun. 2018;15:114-119.
  6. Ojaghi A, Parkhimchyk A, Tabatabaei N. First Step Toward Translation Of Thermophotonic Lock-In Imaging To Dentistry As An Early Caries Detection Technology. J Biomed Opt. 2016;21:096003.
  7. Wright JT, Tampi MP, Graham L, et al. Sealants for Preventing and Arresting Pit-And-Fissure Occlusal Caries In Primary and Permanent Molars. J Am Dent Assoc. 2016;147:631-645.e18.
  8. Moore PA, Hersh E V. Combining Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen For Acute Pain Management After Third-Molar Extractions. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013;144:898-908.
  9. Aminoshariae A, Kulild JC, Donaldson M, et al. Evidence-based Recommendations For Analgesic Efficacy To Treat Pain Of Endodontic Origin. J Am Dent Assoc. 2016;147:826-39.
  10. Meng L, Hua F, Bian Z. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Emerging and Future Challenges for Dental and Oral Medicine. J Dent Res. 2020 May 1;99:481-487.
  11. Spera AL, Saxen MA, Yepes JF, et al. Office-Based Anesthesia: Safety and Outcomes in Pediatric Dental Patients. Anesth Prog. 2017;64:144-152.
  12. Crowley JP. The Most Important Invention In The History Of Dentistry and What It Teaches Us About The Future. J Am Dent Assoc. 2017;148:707–708.
  13. Dawood A, Marti BM, Sauret-Jackson V, et al. 3D Printing in Dentistry. Br Dent J. 2015;219:521–529.
  14. Sheiham A, James WPT. A Reappraisal Of The Quantitative Relationship Between Sugar Intake And Dental Caries: The Need For New Criteria For Developing Goals For Sugar Intake. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:863.
  15. Bernardini F, Tuniz C, Coppa A, et al. Beeswax as Dental Filling on a Neolithic Human Tooth. Ondioli L. PLoS One. 2012;7:e44904.
  16. Beukers NGFM, van der Heijden GJMG, van Wijk AJ, et al. Periodontitis is An Independent Risk Indicator For Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases Among 60 174 Participants In A Large Dental School in The Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017;71:37-42.
  17. Al-Jewair TS, Nazir MA, Al-Masoud NN, et al. Prevalence and Risks Of Habitual Snoring And Obstructive Sleep Apnea Symptoms In Adult Dental Patients. Saudi Med J. 2016;37:183-190.
  18. Taylor WTT, Bayarsaikhan J, Tuvshinjargal T, et al. Origins of Equine Dentistry. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115:e6707-e6715.
  19. Peralta G, Tobin-D’Angelo M, Parham A, et al. Notes from The Field: Mycobacterium abscessus Infections Among Patients of a Pediatric Dentistry Practice -Georgia, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65:355-356.
  20. Shah S, Wordley V, Thompson W. How did COVID-19 Impact on Dental Antibiotic Prescribing across England? Br Dent J. 2020.229:601-604.
  21. Lockhart PB, Tampi MP, Abt E, et al. Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline On Antibiotic Use For The Urgent Management of pulpal- and Periapical-Related Dental Pain And Intraoral Swelling. J Am Dent Assoc. 2019;150:906-921.e12.
  22. Habib G, Lancellotti P, Antunes MJ, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for The Management of Infective Endocarditis. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:3075–3128.
  23. Levy B, Paulozzi L, Mack KA, Jones CM. Trends in Opioid Analgesic–Prescribing Rates by Specialty, U.S., 2007-2012. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49:409-413.
  24. Plog J, Wu J, Dias YJ, et al. Reopening Dentistry after COVID-19: Complete Suppression of Aerosolization in Dental Procedures by Viscoelastic Medusa Gorgo. Phys Fluids. 2020;32.
  25. Nalliah RP, Sloss KR, Kenney BC, et al. Association of Opioid Use With Pain and Satisfaction After Dental Extraction. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e200901.
  26. Singh A, Purohit B. Tooth Brushing, Oil Pulling And Tissue Regeneration: A Review of Holistic Approaches To Oral Health. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2011;2:64.
  27. Watt RG, Daly B, Allison P, et al. Ending The Neglect of Global Oral Health: Time For Radical Action. Lancet. 2019;394:261-272.
  28. Frese C, Frese F, Kuhlmann S, et al. Effect of Endurance Training On Dental Erosion, Caries, and Saliva. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25:e319-e326.
  29. Giannobile WV, Braun TM, Caplis AK, et al. Patient Stratification for Preventive Care in Dentistry. J Dent Res. 2013;92:694-701.
  30. Coppa A, Bondioli L, Cucina A, et al. Early Neolithic Tradition of Dentistry. Nature. 2006;440:755-756.
  31. Rhoades KA, Heyman RE, Eddy JM, et al. Patient Aggression Toward Dentists. J Am Dent Assoc. 2020;151:764-769.
  32. Ramsay CR, Clarkson JE, Duncan A, et al. Improving the Quality of Dentistry (IQuaD): A Cluster Factorial Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing The Effectiveness and Cost–Benefit of Oral Hygiene Advice and/or Periodontal Instrumentation With Routine Care For The Prevention and Management of Perio. Health Technol Assess (Rockv). 2018;22:1–144.
  33. Minozzi S, Panetta D, De Sanctis M, et al. A Dental Prosthesis from the Early Modern Age in Tuscany (Italy). Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;19:365-371.
  34. Yue J, Zhao P, Gerasimov JY, et al. 3D-Printable Antimicrobial Composite Resins. Adv Funct Mater. 2015;25:6756–6767.
  35. Vergara-Buenaventura A, Castro-Ruiz C. Use of Mouthwashes against COVID-19 in Dentistry. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Churchill Livingstone. 2020;58:924-927.
  36. Moore DL, Ding L, Yang G, et al. Impact of Instituting General Anesthesia on Oral Sedation Care in a Tertiary Care Pediatric Dental Clinic. Anesth Prog. 2019;66:183-191.
  37. Istrate EC, Slapar FJ, Mallarapu M, et al. Dentists of Tomorrow 2020: An Analysis of The Results of The 2020 ADEA Survey of U.S. Dental School Seniors. J Dent Educ. 2021.
  38. Grandjean P. Developmental Fluoride Neurotoxicity: An Updated Review. Environ Heal. 2019;18:110.
  39. Brewer JD, Gonzalez AB, Baum CL, et al. Comparison of Sterile vs Nonsterile Gloves in Cutaneous Surgery and Common Outpatient Dental Procedures. JAMA Dermatology. 2016;152:1008.
  40. Bush MA, Cooper HI, Dorion RBJ. Inquiry into the Scientific Basis for Bitemark Profiling and Arbitrary Distortion Compensation. J Forensic Sci. 2010;55(4):976–83.
  41. Spivak ES. Antibiotic Use in Dentistry-What We Know and Do Not Know. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e193881.
  42. Sabino-Silva R, Jardim ACG, Siqueira WL. Coronavirus COVID-19 Impacts to Dentistry and Potential Salivary Diagnosis. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24:1619-1621.
  43. Sood S, Nagpal M. Role of Curcumin In Systemic and Oral Health: An Overview. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2013;4:3.
  44. Cohen EEW, LaMonte SJ, Erb NL, et al. American Cancer Society Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:203–239.
  45. Cubayachi C, Couto RO do, de Gaitani CM, et al. Needle-free Buccal Anesthesia Using Iontophoresis and Amino Amide Salts Combined in A Mucoadhesive Formulation. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces. 2015;136:1193-1201.
  46. Hatfield E, Phillips K, Swidan S, et al. Use of Low-Dose Naltrexone In The Management of Chronic Pain Conditions. J Am Dent Assoc. 2020;151:891-902.e1.
  47. Ten Cate JM. Contemporary Perspective on The Use of Fluoride Products In Caries Prevention. Br Dent J. 2013;214:161–167.
  48. Watt RG. From Victim Blaming To Upstream Action: Tackling The Social Determinants of Oral Health Inequalities. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007;35:1-11.
  49. Innes NPT, Chu CH, Fontana M, et al. A Century of Change towards Prevention and Minimal Intervention in Cariology. J Dent Res. 2019;98:611–617.
  50. Padovani GC, Feitosa VP, Sauro S, et al. Advances in Dental Materials through Nanotechnology: Facts, Perspectives, and Toxicological Aspects. Trends Biotechnol. 2015;33:621–36.
  51. Passarelli PC, Rella E, Manicone PF, et al. The Impact of The COVID-19 Infection in Dentistry. Exp Biol Med. 2020;245:940-944.
  52. Wright JT, Crall JJ, Fontana M, et al. Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guideline For The Use of Pit-And-Fissure Sealants. J Am Dent Assoc. 2016;147:672-682.e12.
  53. Thomson WM, Williams SM, Broadbent JM, et al. Long-term Dental Visiting Patterns and Adult Oral Health. J Dent Res. 2010;89:307–311.
  54. Prajapati S, Tao J, Ruan Q, et al. Matrix Metalloproteinase-20 mediates Dental Enamel Biomineralization By Preventing Protein Occlusion Inside Apatite Crystals. Biomaterials. 2016;75:260-270.
  55. Rhoades KA, Heyman RE, Eddy JM, et al. Patient Aggression Toward Dental Students. J Dent Educ. 2020;84:586-592.
  56. Simon L. Overcoming Historical Separation between Oral and General Health Care: Interprofessional Collaboration for Promoting Health Equity. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18:941-949.
  57. Souto-Maior JR, Pellizzer EP, de Luna Gomes JM, et al. Influence of Diabetes on the Survival Rate and Marginal Bone Loss of Dental Implants: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. J Oral Implantol. 2019;45:334-340.
  58. Thornhill MH, Suda KJ, Durkin MJ, et al. Is it time US Dentistry Ended Its Opioid Dependence? J Am Dent Assoc. 2019;150:883-889.
  59. Slayton RL, Urquhart O, Araujo MWB, et al. Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline on Nonrestorative Treatments For Carious Lesions. J Am Dent Assoc. 2018;149:837-849.e19.
  60. Glenny A-M, Oliver R, Roberts GJ, et al. Antibiotics For The Prophylaxis of Bacterial Endocarditis In Dentistry. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013.
  61. Manfredi M, Figini L, Gagliani M, et al. Single versus Multiple Visits For Endodontic Treatment of Permanent Teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016.
  62. Turner L, Mupparapu M, Akintoye SO. Review of The Complications Associated with Treatment of Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Guide For The Dental Practitioner. Quintessence Int. 2013;44:267-279.
  63. Watt RG. COVID-19 is An Opportunity For Reform in Dentistry. Lancet. 2020;396:462.
  64. Coll PP, Lindsay A, Meng J, et al. The Prevention of Infections in Older Adults: Oral Health. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68:411-416.
  65. Chaturvedi T. Uses of Turmeric in Dentistry: An Update. Indian J Dent Res. 2009;20:107.
  66. Mann C, Ranjitkar S, Lekkas D, et al. Three-dimensional Profilometric Assessment of Early Enamel Erosion Simulating Gastric Regurgitation. J Dent. 2014;42:1411-1421.
  67. Sandeep V, Kumar M, Jyostna P, et al. Evaluation of 2-Stage Injection Technique in Children. Anesth Prog. 2016;63:3-7.
  68. Harrel SK, Molinari J. Aerosols and Splatter In Dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135:429-437.
  69. Carter AE. Pathways of Fear and Anxiety In Dentistry: A Review. World J Clin Cases. 2014;2:642.
  70. Niederman R, Huang SS, Trescher A-L, et al. Getting The Incentives Right: Improving Oral Health Equity With Universal School-Based Caries Prevention. Am J Public Health. 2017;107:S50–S55.
  71. Genco RJ, Schifferle RE, Dunford RG, et al. Screening for Diabetes Mellitus In Dental Practices. J Am Dent Assoc. 2014;145:57-64.
  72. Coulthard P. Dentistry and Coronavirus (COVID-19) - Moral Decision-Making. Br Dent J. 2020;228:503–505.
  73. Tian K V., Yang B, Yue Y, et al. Atomic and Vibrational Origins of Mechanical Toughness In Bioactive Cement During Setting. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8631.
  74. Schwendicke F, Krois J, Robertson M, et al. Cost-Effectiveness of The Hall Technique in a Randomized Trial. J Dent Res. 2019;98:61–67.
  75. Holden ACL, Adam L, Thomson WM. Overtreatment As An Ethical Dilemma In Australian Private Dentistry: A Qualitative Exploration. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2021;49:201–208.
  76. Williams S, Hughes T, Adler C, et al. Epigenetics: A New Frontier In Dentistry. Aust Dent J. 2014;59:23–33.
  77. do Couto RO, Cubayachi C, Calefi PL, et al. Combining Amino Amide Salts In Mucoadhesive Films Enhances Needle-Free Buccal Anesthesia In Adults. J Control Release. 2017;266:205-215.
  78. Pynnonen MA, Gillespie MB, Roman B, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline: Evaluation of the Neck Mass in Adults. Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2017;157:S1-S30.
  79. Stockton L, Simonsen C, Seago S. Nitrous Oxide–Induced Vitamin B12 Deficiency. Baylor Univ Med Cent Proc. 2017;30:171-172.
  80. Mejàre IA, Klingberg G, Mowafi FK, et al. A Systematic Map of Systematic Reviews in Pediatric Dentistry-What Do We Really Know? PLoS One. 2015;10:e0117537.
  81. Bissar A, Schiller P, Wolff A, et al. Factors Contributing To Severe Early Childhood Caries In South-West Germany. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18:1411-1418.
  82. Abadeh A, Ali AA, Bradley G, et al. Increase in Detection Of Oral Cancer and Precursor Lesions By Dentists. J Am Dent Assoc. 2019;150:531-539.
  83. Sbaraini A, Carter SM, Evans RW, et al. Experiences of Dental Care: What Do Patients Value? BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:177.
  84. Ashley PF, Parekh S, Moles DR, et al. Preoperative Analgesics For Additional Pain Relief in Children and Adolescents Having Dental Treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016.
  85. J HK. Oral Health Risk Assessment Timing and Establishment of the Dental Home. Pediatrics. 2003;111:1113-1116.
  86. Saxen MA, Urman RD, Yepes JF, et al. Comparison of Anesthesia for Dental/Oral Surgery by Office-based Dentist Anesthesiologists versus Operating Room-based Physician Anesthesiologists. Anesth Prog. 2017;64:212–220.
  87. Holden ACL. Cosmetic Dentistry: A Socioethical Evaluation. Bioethics. 2018;32:602-610.
  88. Brondani M, Donnelly L. The HIV and SARS-CoV-2 Parallel in Dentistry from the Perspectives of the Oral Health Care Team. JDR Clin Transl Res. 2021;6:40-46.
  89. Rathore M, Pant V, Singh A. The Dental Amalgam Toxicity Fear: A Myth or Actuality. Toxicol Int. 2012;19:81.
  90. Emami E, de Souza RF, Kabawat M, et al. The Impact of Edentulism on Oral and General Health. Int J Dent. 2013;2013:1–7.
  91. Burt BA. Fluoridation and Social Equity. J Public Health Dent. 2002;62:195–200.
  92. Afrashtehfar KI, Assery MK. From Dental Science To Clinical Practice: Knowledge Translation And Evidence-Based Dentistry Principles. Saudi Dent J. 2017;29:83–92.
  93. Bidra AS, Daubert DM, Garcia LT, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Recall and Maintenance of Patients with Tooth-Borne and Implant-Borne Dental Restorations. J Prosthodont. 2016;25:S32–S40.
  94. Thompson W, Tonkin-Crine S, Pavitt SH, et al. Factors Associated With Antibiotic Prescribing For Adults With Acute Conditions: An Umbrella Review Across Primary Care And A Systematic Review Focusing on Primary Dental Care. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019;74:2139–2152.
  95. Stevens CL. Is Dental Caries Neglect? Br Dent J. 2014;217:499–500.
  96. McGrath C. Behavioral Sciences in the Promotion of Oral Health. J Dent Res. 2019;98:1418–24.
  97. Klein U, Nowak AJ. Characteristics of Patients with Autistic Disorder (AD) Presenting For Dental Treatment: A Survey And Chart Review. Spec Care Dent. 1999;19:200-207.
  98. Ashley PF, Chaudhary M, Lourenço-Matharu L. Sedation of Children Undergoing Dental Treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;2018.
  99. Kumbargere Nagraj S, Eachempati P, Paisi M, et al. Interventions to Reduce Contaminated Aerosols Produced During Dental Procedures For Preventing Infectious Diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;10:CD013686.
  100. Ensaldo-Carrasco E, Carson-Stevens A, Cresswell K, et al. Developing Agreement on Never Events In Primary Care Dentistry: An International eDelphi Study. Br Dent J. 2018;224:733-740.
  101. Wang J, Alotaibi NM, Ibrahim GM, et al. The Spectrum of Altmetrics in Neurosurgery: The Top 100 “Trending” Articles in Neurosurgical Journals. World Neurosurg. 2017;103:883-895.e1.
  102. Tattersall A, Carroll C. What Can Altmetric.com Tell Us About Policy Citations of Research? An Analysis of Altmetric.com Data for Research Articles from the University of Sheffield. Front Res Metrics Anal. 2018;2.
  103. Kim Y, Kim JE, Kim YH, et al. Social Attention and Scientific Articles on Stroke: Altmetric Analysis of top-50 Articles. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019;183.
  104. Feijoo JF, Limeres J, Fernández-Varela M, et al. The 100 Most Cited Articles in Dentistry. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18:699-706.
  105. Kolahi J, Khazaei S. Altmetric Analysis of Contemporary Dental Literature. Br Dent J. 2018;225:68-72.
  106. Kolahi J, Khazaei S. Altmetric: Top 50 Dental Articles in 2014. Br Dent J. 2016;220:569–574.

CORRESPONDENCE & COPYRIGHT

Corresponding Author: Ricardo Grillo, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Brazil.

Copyright: © 2021 All copyrights are reserved by Ricardo Grillo, published by Coalesce Research Group. This work is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Support Links

Track Your Article

Twitter Tweets